Since the rise of MTV in the early 1980s, music videos have been inseparable from the popular music industry. They were first introduced as promotional tools, meant to give artists another medium for exposure and listeners another way to engage with a track. But as the format became dominant, a curious side effect emerged: music videos sometimes distort, weaken, or even ruin the experience of the song itself.
Music is an abstract art. It lives in sound waves, rhythms, and harmonies that listeners interpret subjectively. A song allows room for imagination — listeners may visualize personal memories, landscapes, or emotions that give the track deeper meaning. But a music video imposes a prepackaged narrative, visual style, or character on top of the music. Once those images are seen, they can override the personal interpretations a listener might otherwise have carried.
For example, a song that felt universal in its themes may suddenly become locked into a single storyline, such as a literal romance plot or a hyper-stylized aesthetic that makes the lyrics feel cartoonish. This visual “priming” anchors the song to the video’s imagery and can permanently color how the track is perceived thereafter.
Not every music video harmonizes with its song. In fact, some videos create dissonance by presenting visuals that feel tonally off from the music. A serious ballad paired with campy acting or low-budget effects can undermine the song’s emotional resonance. Similarly, an overproduced video might overwhelm the track, drawing attention away from the subtle elements that made it compelling in the first place.
In these cases, the listener’s memory of the song becomes entangled with disappointment in the video. Instead of recalling the mood created by the music alone, the audience recalls awkward dance moves, heavy-handed storytelling, or contrived symbolism.
Another risk is that music videos can reduce songs to branding tools. The music becomes background for an artist’s image campaign, where clothing, choreography, or celebrity cameos dominate over the music itself. In this sense, the video can hijack the meaning of the song, turning it into a vehicle for image rather than artistry. What may have been an introspective or layered track gets flattened into a three-minute advertisement.
Perhaps the most lasting impact is how a music video shapes first impressions. Listeners who hear a song for the first time while watching its video don’t experience the track in its raw form — they experience it mediated by visuals, editing, and narrative cues. That initial framing can be hard to escape. Even if the video is later ignored, the memory of it is bound up with the sound, permanently altering the way the song is perceived.
Music videos are not inherently harmful. At their best, they enrich the listening experience, adding layers of meaning or artistry that expand rather than constrict interpretation. Yet, it is important to recognize their power to overwrite personal engagement with a song. When visuals dominate or clash, they can cheapen or ruin what the music could have been on its own.
Sometimes the purest way to encounter a song is simply to close your eyes and listen — letting the music build its own world, unshaped by someone else’s camera.
Image credit: freepik.com
© 2025 Good 2 Go Rock 'N' Roll